by jimwalton » Sun Mar 23, 2014 4:08 pm
This statement of Jesus is too generic to pin down with any accuracy. There are a number of rather credible interpretations, but none of them has any certainty. To me the best of the field are:
1. That it applied to them (the disciples of AD 32) and was speaking of the destruction of the temple and Jerusalem in AD 70. Many of the prophetic elements in Matthew 24 could be talking about the Roman destruction that came then, so this could be talking about it as well. Many Bible scholars agree with this interpretation.
2. That it applies to the generation that will see the Great Tribulation, the abomination of desolation, and the 2nd coming of Christ. The idea is that the teaching is about that those people (the generation) who is around when all of the end times stuff starts will also still be around when it comes to completion—that the end times stuff is 7 years long, and those that are around for the beginning won't experience another gap, but it'll come in its fullness. Many of the prophetic elements of Mt. 24 seem to be clearly talking about his second coming, and so "this generation" is the generation of that event.
There are pros and cons, strengths and weaknesses of both of those interpretations, based on the neutral nature of Jesus' words. And there are other possibilities as well.
In either case, though, the conclusion is not that Jesus was not the messiah. In the first scenario, it came true just as he said; in the second scene, we are still waiting for that time to come.
This statement of Jesus is too generic to pin down with any accuracy. There are a number of rather credible interpretations, but none of them has any certainty. To me the best of the field are:
1. That it applied to them (the disciples of AD 32) and was speaking of the destruction of the temple and Jerusalem in AD 70. Many of the prophetic elements in Matthew 24 could be talking about the Roman destruction that came then, so this could be talking about it as well. Many Bible scholars agree with this interpretation.
2. That it applies to the generation that will see the Great Tribulation, the abomination of desolation, and the 2nd coming of Christ. The idea is that the teaching is about that those people (the generation) who is around when all of the end times stuff starts will also still be around when it comes to completion—that the end times stuff is 7 years long, and those that are around for the beginning won't experience another gap, but it'll come in its fullness. Many of the prophetic elements of Mt. 24 seem to be clearly talking about his second coming, and so "this generation" is the generation of that event.
There are pros and cons, strengths and weaknesses of both of those interpretations, based on the neutral nature of Jesus' words. And there are other possibilities as well.
In either case, though, the conclusion is not that Jesus was not the messiah. In the first scenario, it came true just as he said; in the second scene, we are still waiting for that time to come.