by jimwalton » Tue Jun 09, 2020 4:55 pm
Deuteronomy 6.4-9 is not making any kind of trinitarian statement. It is a statement to Israel that He alone is the true God, and to the nations that Israel had a special status (as receptors of the covenant).
I'll assume that you know that אֶחָֽד (‘echad) means "one," but it's the same word that is used in Gn. 2.24: "The two shall be one flesh." It's an expression of unity and, in the case of the Shema, of his "only-ness." It is conventionally translated as the cardinal number "one," but it is also used consistently throughout the Biblical text to denote the ordinal number "first (when there is no second)." None of these ideas particularly invite the concept of the trinity, but they don't exclude it, either.
Deuteronomy 6.4-9 is not making any kind of trinitarian statement. It is a statement to Israel that He alone is the true God, and to the nations that Israel had a special status (as receptors of the covenant).
I'll assume that you know that אֶחָֽד ([i]‘echad[/i]) means "one," but it's the same word that is used in Gn. 2.24: "The two shall be one flesh." It's an expression of unity and, in the case of the [i]Shema[/i], of his "only-ness." It is conventionally translated as the cardinal number "one," but it is also used consistently throughout the Biblical text to denote the ordinal number "first (when there is no second)." None of these ideas particularly invite the concept of the trinity, but they don't exclude it, either.