Board index ‹ God

[TrakeM]

You showed your evidence for A god existing. Not YOUR god existing. The difference is tremendous. You can YouTube the names of your arguments and watch people rip them to shreds.

Personal experience isn't evidence for your god. You don't accept the personal experiences of Mormons as evidence. Why should anyone consider your personal experiences to be better evidence than theirs? Either they are both evidence showing that it's poor evidence because it points you in hundreds of directions all mutually exclusive, or it isn't evidence. (There are hundreds of religions)