by jimwalton » Mon Jun 12, 2017 11:30 pm
“Does everyone hear from God the same way?” Not completely. The Bible is God’s revelation of Himself, and it is the primary way He makes himself known. Hebrews 1.1-2 says that God speaks through the prophets (and also the apostles, Ephesians 2.20), and through Jesus. And that’s what the Bible is: the record of God speaking through Jesus, the prophets, and the apostles. But we also know from the Bible that God speaks to people in many ways: a burning bush, visions, an audible voice, dreams, miracles, circumstances, other people, good works—right? God isn’t limited to how He speaks to us, but the Bible is the main way God says he talks to people.
“What’s with all the books and movies about people going to heaven and coming back and telling other people what they saw?” Those stories are SO INTERESTING, aren’t they? It’s hard to know what to make of them because some of them are so convincing. I wonder, though, why does nobody ever have an experience like that about going to hell and coming back and telling other people what they saw? Why is it always heaven? I’m not sure what to think of all those stories.
“What am I supposed to do with speaking in tongues?” There are Christians like myself who don’t speak in tongues and don’t consider it either necessary or beneficial. There are also Christians who do speak in tongues and consider it to be valuable. You need to study the Scriptures yourself and let God speak to you. Three times in the book of Acts people spoke in tongues, and Paul wrote about it in 1 Corinthians 12-14.
“Why don’t you seek speaking in tongues?” Because 1 Corinthians 14 says other practices are better to seek.
“How do you know what a person’s spiritual gifts are?” There are surveys you can take to help you discover your spiritual gifts. Sometimes churches run seminars (or special teaching times) for people in the congregation to take the surveys and discover their gifts. Sometimes people just know what their gifts are; they don’t need to take the tests.
“Is interpreting tongues a spiritual gift?” Yes. 1 Corinthians 12.10 says so.
“How does God have no substance but have all power?” Awesome question! Because there is such a thing as spiritual realities and spiritual power. All power isn’t physical. Magnetism teaches us that, and so does gravity. There’s nothing there to find—even if you dig all the way through the earth you won’t find any “place” or any “thing” that is the source of gravity. It has no substances but it has power.
“God is a spirit?” Yes. John 4.24 says so. He has no body parts: no eyes, no hands, no heart. He is non-material. But we’re not to think of God as nothingness. The idea in his Spirit-ness is that he is not confined to time and space, not that he isn't there. He is certainly not a part of our flesh-and-blood world, He is still not an "it." He is a "He," meaning that He is a being. It's never as if he's “the force” or anything like that.
“But Jesus is God? How does that work?” Are you writing late at night again? : ) We already covered this. "We believe that God exists as one essence (one deity) who manifests Himself as three distinct persons—the Father, Son, and Spirit. But “manifests” isn’t really the best choice of term, because it’s not just that God shows Himself in three different ways, it’s that the one God exists as 3 persons. The best analogy I’ve heard (though they all fall short) is: suppose I were going to write a book, and I make myself the main character in the book. The character in the book thinks like me, talks like me, acts like me—well, he IS me. And yet he’s NOT me. I’m out here, and the character in the book is, well, in the book. So he’s me, but he’s different from me. We’re both the same “Jim,” but we’re also separate and distinct. In the book I could even make the “Jim” in the book talk to the Jim who is writing the book, or vice versa.” Now you remember.
“Where does God come from? How is one always just there?” Something has to be eternal. It’s either matter or energy or the universe or God or something. Everything that has a beginning had to have a cause. Scientists tell us the universe had a beginning (the Big Bang). We know of nothing that just popped into existence spontaneously all by itself—nothing we know of is self-caused. We know of nothing that at any time began to exist from its own nature (How can something pop itself into existence when it doesn’t exist?). Everything that had a beginning was brought into existence by something else that already existed, whether technological, mechanical, or even biological. Even biological things came from other biological things, or at least from something that already existed. Something had to always have existed. So what caused the universe to begin to exist? It has to have had a cause. God is a reasonable choice as to that cause. Something has to be eternal, and scientists tell us it isn’t the universe, matter, or energy. Then what is eternal?
We're intelligent people, right? We know that if we have nothing, we get nothing. If anything can pop into existence from nothing (like a pink unicorn), then there is no such thing as science. But there is something.
We know that we have an eternal cause. Something always was (whether matter, energy, a singularity, a metaphysical being). Something must have always existed. There must be some eternal first cause, whatever it was.
We know that we have a timeless cause. If the past is infinite, we would have no present. Imagine going to Wegmans to the deli counter. There you see a red thingy that says “Before you take a ticket, you have to take a ticket from the red thingy to the right.” And there’s a sign on that one that says the same thing. And on the next one. And the next. Only if we ever get to one that says “Take a ticket” can we run the sequence and get back to the counter. We can only get back to the counter if the line of red thingys isn’t infinite. Only if the past is finite can there be a present, so the cause of the universe must be timeless.
There must be a personal cause. Impersonal causes must have first causes. Only personal causes are capable of being first causes. Kinetic energy is energy is motion; potential energy is energy stored. The only way something begins in motion is if there is a first cause. What puts a system in motion?
We must have an intelligent cause. There are three types of data (random data, which doesn't require an intelligent cause, ordered data, such as snowflakes, which don't necessarily require an intelligent cause, and information data). There is no example in science that informational data can come from anything but an intelligent cause.
There must be a moral cause. We all know there is such a thing as right and wrong, good and evil. Though we disagree on some of what goes into those categories, we all subscribe to such objectivities as the existence of right and wrong. If we infer the most reasonable conclusion, we infer an objective moral source for objective moral realities. Without it there is not possible objective evaluation of an action or a thought as good or evil, because such things are only based on opinion and one's own perception. Everything would just be morally blank. There would be nothing wrong with murdering someone, and nothing good about saving a bus full of children from crashing down a cliff. Elaborate complex chemical reactions do not have any moral value or moral agency. Everyone would simply be a physical collection of atoms. Everything would simply just be. Without God, we might live in a MadMax world of insanity and chaos, but we could call that bad—just what is. We might live in a humanist utopia, but we couldn't call that good—just what is.
In other words, the world as we know it can only come from an eternal, timeless, personal, intelligent, powerful, purposeful, moral, free will, meaningful cause. And that’s God. He always was. Something always was, and God is the most logical answer.
Glad to talk to you. Keep ‘em coming!