> I just can't believe your God is this impotent to allow these things to happen.
The presence of opponents is not the definition of impotence. Allowing opponents to act is not the definition of impotence. Impotence is being unable to take effective action; it's being powerless or helpless. If you read these texts fairly (meaning not with a closed mind), you can easily see that powerlessness, helplessness, and impotence are not in the picture. Sometimes, as we all know to be true, there are advantages to letting an enemy make headway on one front or another, for strategic purposes. Sometimes, as we all know to be true, because of the necessity of free will, our enemy is able to play out options. We might always be able to meet them with superior force, but the enemy can always play them out. Do you remember the US invasion of Grenada in 1983? (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Grenada). The enemy has power, and makes strategic moves, but that doesn't make the US impotent against it.
> there is no evidence for Exodus
Well, you obviously haven't done your homework. If you want to discuss this, I'd be glad to.