by jimwalton » Mon Feb 20, 2017 5:49 pm
Vertner, they always do. Whenever Christian people get involved in worldly powers, the struggles of power, good, national interest, public opinion, economics, class, and justice create many points of compromise and even some of problems—especially when that government is not seeking to be a theocracy (on the one hand) and is mandating a separation of church and state on the other. The Founding Fathers were mostly Christian people, but they were governing a pluralistic nation with a mixed ethnic, political, and social history in a grand civic experiment: a republic governed "of the people, by the people, and for the people." It's inevitable that some anti-biblical policy will be created, but that doesn't mean its foundations weren't in Christian principles, based in biblical concepts, and run by Christian people. All human structures are ultimately unfair to someone, and the anti-biblical parts of our history are not only unfortunate but at times tragic. We work towards a just and moral society, but the restraints of governing a mixed people, of ruling in a godly fashion but still maintaining the separation of church and state, and being subject to the popular vote will inevitably yield some unfortunate results at times. But does this mean the nation is not founded on biblical principles? I would like to dialogue with you and others about this.