At this point some of the threads are running together.
>No one can do this. I can show that this existence is logical, more reasonable than the alternatives, concordant with science, and consistent with experience. But I cannot objectively show that God is true. I can only infer the most reasonable conclusion. As I have firmly established, not everything that falls into the category of knowledge and reason is subject to the objectivity of the scientific method.
I don't think you are understanding what I'm saying. Take a look at my whole statement. I wasn't just saying you can't objectively show that your god exists. I was saying that the fact that you can't objectively show that your god exists means that you don't have objective morality because your morality is based on the idea that your god exists. Honestly, I thought that was clear from my original statement. I'm willing to admit the possibility maybe I just wasn't very clear.